Jarkko Nieminen def. Lovro Zovko 7-5 4-6 7-5

Back

Helsinki Challenger

Challenger · Final · Hard

Final

Jarkko Nieminen

WinnerFIN · Rank #1029

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 24–6

Set 37–5

Lovro Zovko

LostCRO · Rank #1136

Nieminen won in 3 sets

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Tali Tennis Center

Helsinki, FIN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Altitude

0 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

2Nieminen

0Zovko

2 meetings

Helsinki ChallengerFinal · 2002HardThis match
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7
Lovro Zovko
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
StockholmQualifying R2 · 21 Oct 2001Hard
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Lovro Zovko
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 1

Form and path

Jarkko Nieminen1–5

StockholmHard

LRound of 32
Nicolas Almagro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 4

TokyoHard

LQualifying R1
Mikhail Youzhny
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 3

Kuala LumpurHard

LRound of 32
Tatsuma Ito
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6³

US OpenHard

LRound of 128
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1Set 3: 1

Tampere CHClay

Lovro Zovko3–3

Ortisei CHHard

Rennes CHHard

Genoa CHClay

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Back

Helsinki Challenger

Challenger · Final · Hard

Final

Jarkko Nieminen

WinnerFIN · Rank #1029

2–1

Set 17–5

Set 24–6

Set 37–5

Lovro Zovko

LostCRO · Rank #1136

Nieminen won in 3 sets

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Tali Tennis Center

Helsinki, FIN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Altitude

0 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Sea level

Head to head

2Nieminen

0Zovko

2 meetings

Helsinki ChallengerFinal · 2002HardThis match
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 7
Lovro Zovko
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
StockholmQualifying R2 · 21 Oct 2001Hard
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Lovro Zovko
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 1

Form and path

Jarkko Nieminen1–5

StockholmHard

LRound of 32
Nicolas Almagro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 4

TokyoHard

LQualifying R1
Mikhail Youzhny
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 3

Kuala LumpurHard

LRound of 32
Tatsuma Ito
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6³

US OpenHard

LRound of 128
Jo-Wilfried Tsonga
Sets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jarkko Nieminen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1Set 3: 1

Tampere CHClay

Lovro Zovko3–3

Ortisei CHHard

Rennes CHHard

Genoa CHClay

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research