Gianluca Mager def. Sebastian Baez 7-6(8) 6-2

Back

Prostejov Challenger

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 16 Jun

Final

Gianluca Mager

WinnerITA · Rank #1223

2–0

Set 17–6⁸

Set 26–2

Sebastian Baez

LostARG · Rank #51

Mager won in 2 sets · 1h 37m

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

TK Agrofert Prostějov

Prostejov, CZE· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Light

Humidity

56%

Moderate

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

228 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 37m

Gianluca MagerMagerMatch statsSebastian BaezBaez

4Aces3

1Double faults2

52Service points won43

10Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played10

4/5(80%)Break points saved8/11(73%)

3/11(27%)Break points converted1/5(20%)

First- and second-serve breakdown unavailable.

Head to head

1Mager

0Baez

1 meeting

Prostejov ChallengerRound of 16 · 16 Jun 2021ClayThis match
Gianluca Mager
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7¹⁰Set 2: 6
Sebastian Baez
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁸Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Back

Prostejov Challenger

Challenger · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 16 Jun

Final

Gianluca Mager

WinnerITA · Rank #1223

2–0

Set 17–6⁸

Set 26–2

Sebastian Baez

LostARG · Rank #51

Mager won in 2 sets · 1h 37m

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

TK Agrofert Prostějov

Prostejov, CZE· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Light

Humidity

56%

Moderate

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

228 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 37m

Gianluca MagerMagerMatch statsSebastian BaezBaez

4Aces3

1Double faults2

52Service points won43

10Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played10

4/5(80%)Break points saved8/11(73%)

3/11(27%)Break points converted1/5(20%)

First- and second-serve breakdown unavailable.

Head to head

1Mager

0Baez

1 meeting

Prostejov ChallengerRound of 16 · 16 Jun 2021ClayThis match
Gianluca Mager
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7¹⁰Set 2: 6
Sebastian Baez
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁸Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research