Nishesh Basavareddy def. Mark Lajal 6-3 7-6(3)

Back

Knoxville Challenger

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 8 Nov

Final

Nishesh Basavareddy

WinnerUSA · Rank #139

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 27–6³

Mark Lajal

LostEST · Rank #147

Basavareddy won in 2 sets · 1h 40m

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Goodfriend Tennis Center

Knoxville, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Altitude

281 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 40m

Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddyMatch statsMark LajalLajal

6Aces5

3Double faults4

48Service points won39

11Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played11

3/5(60%)Break points saved6/9(67%)

3/9(33%)Break points converted2/5(40%)

First- and second-serve breakdown unavailable.

Head to head

2Basavareddy

0Lajal

2 meetings

Knoxville ChallengerQuarterfinal · 8 Nov 2024HardThis match
Nishesh Basavareddy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Mark Lajal
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6³
Chicago ChallengerRound of 32 · 23 Jul 2024Hard
Nishesh Basavareddy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 7
Mark Lajal
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Back

Knoxville Challenger

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 8 Nov

Final

Nishesh Basavareddy

WinnerUSA · Rank #139

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 27–6³

Mark Lajal

LostEST · Rank #147

Basavareddy won in 2 sets · 1h 40m

Venue and conditions

At the match

Venue

Goodfriend Tennis Center

Knoxville, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

How fast does this court play?

Unlock with Pro

Altitude

281 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 40m

Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddyMatch statsMark LajalLajal

6Aces5

3Double faults4

48Service points won39

11Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played11

3/5(60%)Break points saved6/9(67%)

3/9(33%)Break points converted2/5(40%)

First- and second-serve breakdown unavailable.

Head to head

2Basavareddy

0Lajal

2 meetings

Knoxville ChallengerQuarterfinal · 8 Nov 2024HardThis match
Nishesh Basavareddy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Mark Lajal
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6³
Chicago ChallengerRound of 32 · 23 Jul 2024Hard
Nishesh Basavareddy
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 7
Mark Lajal
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Explore player performance in the conditions, compare recent form and inspect the matches behind each number.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Explore Pro

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research